Autonomy vs Institutionalisation
Nataša Serec
I am very interested in developing the internal economy of Metelkova, because we have so many possibilities and they are not all used yet. For example, we can earn money from recycling. Further, a proportion of the profit the youth hostel based here makes can be invested into maintaining the green spaces here, or similar. Further, we always need to feed the bands that play here and put them up somewhere, so why not cater for all this inside the centre to save money, to be more self-sufficient in economical terms, and not so dependent on the city and the government. They support us now, but who knows what will be in four years’ time when governments change. This is what I see as our greatest problem at the moment – that we`re not so conscious about the direction we’re taking, we’re just somehow going in this direction. We say \\\\\\\"we are autonomous\\\\\\\" – and of course compared to many other legal places we are, but still, we are not all that autonomous – what would we do without all the subsidies, for example?
Related fights
- Taking your ideas seriously
- How Watershed works
- New model of culture
- Cultural centres as citizen initiatives
- What is Creative Factory Rotterdam?
- Models of success
- From squat to a legal venue
- Autonomy vs Institutionalisation
- Story of PROEKT_FABRIKA in Moscow
- Paper factory worker = Culture centre worker
- Media Evolution
- Generator Sverige
- Creative Industries in Europe
- What Kind of Creative Entrepreneur Are You?
- Verkatehdas
- Evolution of The MitOst’s Strategy
- What is the creative incubator?
- Culture centres as stores and boutiques
- Village Underground runs three companies
- Incubator in Village Underground
- ufaFabrik works in three directions
- Why the ufaFabrik still exists?
- Changing role of ufaFabrik
- What is Linnalabor?
- Meet Factory is a recognizable brand
- NOASS is not only a venue
- Start of Uzupis Art Incubator